Table 2

Round 3—Current (C) and Future (F) Ratings

Counselor Task Items Rated 5, 4, or 3¹ for Use of CRT² to Perform the Task by ³ 50% Panelists

Counselor and Technologist Combined Ratings N=21

C³	F⁴	Counselor Task Category	Counselor Task Item	% C⁵	% F⁶	f-C⁷	f-F⁸	M-C⁹	M-F¹⁰
6	6	Marketing	01—Advertising preparation	95%	100%	20	21	3.90	4.95
16	14		02—Advertising delivery	91%	100%	19	21	3.16	4.86
20	21		47—List of services/self-help guides	100%	100%	21	20	3.10	4.15
12	27		03—Community service presentations	80%	100%	17	21	3.24	4.05
13	11	Record-keeping	04—Externally required forms	86%	100%	18	21	3.17	4.90
11	12		06—Internal/Counselor-generated forms	91%	100%	19	21	3.32	4.86
14	13		05—Client-generated forms	86%	100%	18	21	3.17	4.86
24	23		48—Case management organizer	95%	100%	20	21	3.05	4.14
18	19	Therapy	24—Follow-up	76%	100%	16	21	3.13	4.71
25	22	—Initial evaluation	12—Client demographics	91%	100%	19	21	3.05	4.14
26	28		18—Homework assignments	91%	100%	19	21	3.00	4.05
	35	—Initial evaluation	13—Personal/family history		95%		20		3.95
	37	—Initial evaluation	14—Clinical history		95%		20		3.90
	39	—Interventions	23—Other		86%		18		3.17
	40	—Interventions	21—Behavioral		91%		19		3.16
	41		10—Group prescreening		95%		19		3.11
	42	—Initial evaluation	11—Presenting problem		91%		19		3.11
	43	—Interventions	20—Cognitive		86%		18		3.11
	44		07—Establish rapport		76%		16		3.06
	46		16—Develop treatment plan		95%		20		3.05
	47	—Interventions	22—Combined		95%		20		3.05
	48		09—Overview of problem		95%		20		3.00
	49		15—Establish goals		91%		19		3.00
2	5	Assessment	26—Test scoring	91%	100%	19	21	4.00	4.95
10	10		25—Test administration	86%	100%	18	21	3.83	4.90
9	20		27—Test interpretation	91%	100%	19	20	3.84	4.70
15	30		28—Diagnosis (DSM-IV)	90%	95%	18	20	3.17	4.00
3	8	Consultation	29—Networking	95%	100%	20	21	3.95	4.90
19	15		30—Referrals	91%	100%	19	21	3.11	4.86
17	18	Supervision	35—Conduct training workshops	95%	100%	20	20	3.15	4.75
29	25		33—of site supervisors	91%	95%	19	20	3.00	4.10
28	29		32—of supervisors	86%	96%	18	20	3.00	4.05
27	31		31—of students	91%	96%	19	20	3.00	4.00
	36		34—Live supervision		91%		19		3.95
1	1	Professional Development	42—Professional writing	95%	100%	20	21	4.05	5.00
4	2	—Self-study	39—Web-based research	100%	100%	21	21	3.95	5.00
7	3	—Self-study	40—Programs/software	91%	100%	19	21	3.89	5.00
8	4	—Self-study	38—Computer-related information/research	100%	100%	21	21	3.86	5.00
21	7	—Self-study	36—legal/ethical issues	95%	100%	20	21	3.10	4.95
5	19		43—Professional listservs	91%	100%	19	21	3.95	4.90
22	16	—Self-study	37—reading books/journals	95%	100%	20	21	3.10	4.86
23	17		41—Licensure/credentialing	81%	95%	17	19	3.06	4.79
	24		49—Continuing Education		100%		21		4.14
31	32		46—Self-evaluation/report	81%	91%	17	19	3.00	4.00
	33		45—Peer group supervision		91%		19		4.00
30	34		44—Attend workshops/conventions	76%	95%	16	20	3.00	3.95
	26	Professional Accountability—Report ethical violations	50—to licensing boards		86%		18		4.06
	38		53—Therapeutic effectiveness reports		95%		19		3.53
	45		52—Peer reviews of competency		90%		18		3.06

^{15 = Essential 4 = Very Helpful 3 = Helpful ²CRT
(computer-related technology) ³ rank-ordered mean current ratings ⁴rank-ordered
mean future ratings

^{5Total % responding 5, 4, or 3 for current use ⁶Total %
responding 5, 4, or 3 for future use ⁷frequency count for current
ratings ⁸frequency count for future ratings
^{9mean current ratings ¹⁰mean future ratings}}

© Katherine Cabaniss

The URL for the dissertation is:

http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-03072001-175713/}