Table 5

Round 2-B

CRT¹ Tools Rated 5, 4, or 3² for Use of CRT Tools to Perform Counselor Tasks by ³ 50% Panelists

Grouped by Counselor Task Category

Counselor (C) and Technologist (T) Ratings Comparison³ Total N=25

C⁴	T⁵	Counselor Task Category	CRT Tool Item	% C⁶	% T⁷	f-C⁸	f-T⁹	M Rating-C¹⁰	M Rating-T¹¹
2	9	Marketing	03—web	89%	86%	16	6	4.31	4.00
3	4		02—word processing	89%	86%	16	6	4.19	4.33
8	11		01—e-mail	61%	57%	11	4	3.82	3.75
12			09—statistics software	50%		9		3.67
17	10		06—graphics	83%	57%	15	4	3.40	4.00
23			05—project management	67%		12		3.25
1	1	Record-keeping	02—word processing	100%	86%	18	6	4.50	4.83
7	12		01—e-mail	67%	57%	12	4	3.92	3.75
13			03—web	50%		9		3.67
15			05—project management	56%		10		3.60
18			04—spread sheet	83%		15		3.40
20			09—statistics software	67%		12		3.33
22		Therapy	03—web	61%		11		3.27
	3		02—word processing		57%		4		4.50
	14		01—e-mail		57%		4		3.75
14	15	Assessment	02—word processing	72%	72%	13	5	3.62	3.60
24			03—web	50%		9		3.00
16	7	Consultation	02—word processing	89%	57%	16	4	3.56	4.00
19	6		01—e-mail	89%	86%	16	6	3.38	4.00
21	8		03—web	78%	72%	14	5	3.29	4.00
5		Supervision	02—word processing	83%		15		4.00
10	13		01—e-mail	72%	57%	13	4	3.77	3.75
11	16		03—web	67%	57%	12	4	3.67	3.25
4	5	Professional Development	03—web	100%	86%	18	6	4.06	4.33
6			02—word processing	83%		15		3.93
9	2		01—e-mail	100%	86%	18	6	3.78	4.50

^{1CRT (Computer-Related Technology) ²5
= Daily use; 4 = Weekly use; 3 = Occasional use ³counselor
n=18 ; technologist n=7 ⁴rank-ordered mean
Counselor ratings⁵rank-ordered Technologist ratings ⁶Total
% Counselors responding ⁷Total % Technologists responding ⁸Counselor
rating frequency count⁹Technologist rating frequency count ¹⁰mean
Counselor ratings ¹¹mean Technologist ratings

© Katherine Cabaniss

The URL for the dissertation is:

http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-03072001-175713/}