Abstract

             An estimated 15% of the American population experiences Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in their lifetime. Those with PTSD have a higher probability of developing an addictive behavior as a means to cope with symptoms associated with this diagnosis. Behavioral addictions, such as Internet usage, need to be considered while working with PTSD clients. An overview of Internet addictions will be provided, along with a brief explanation of how behavioral addictions can affect the behavioral, neurobiological, and psychological aspects of the individual. Some suggestions for treatment will be provided.


">  Audio Introduction

           School shootings, terrorism, and military conflict have become more publicized over the last decade. Due to the increased awareness of violent acts in society, it is logical that posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is poised to be one of the most prevalent mental health issues today. A study by Kessler, Sonnega, Bromet, Hughes and Nelson (1995) showed that over their lifespan, 10 % of women and 5% of men in the United States will experience PTSD. Clients diagnosed with PTSD have a lower resistance to stressors and are ill equipped to cope with the symptoms of flashbacks, emotional restriction, and need for isolation from the external world (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). In need of coping mechanisms, clients will resort to dangerous behaviors, such as excessive drug use, to get relief from their suffering (Brady, Back, & Coffey, 2004). As a result, there is a high co-morbidity rate of PTSD clients using addictive behaviors such as drugs and alcohol as a means of coping with symptoms (Keane, Gerardi, Lyons, & Wolfe, 1988; Kofoed, Freidman, & Peck, 1993). These substances offer an element of escapism and isolation that the client seeks to assuage conflict with others, avoid unwanted emotions, and mitigate the discomfort of flashbacks (Brown & Ouimette, 1999). However, Internet addiction as a tool for escape has not been considered as a coping mechanism for PTSD before.  

            The Internet has become a common companion for people across the world, and it is estimated that there may be one billion users by 2005 (ET Forecasts.com, 2001). Since its increase in popularity, the Internet has gained momentum due to the attractive nature of its accessibility, affordability, and anonymity (Cooper, 1998a). For twenty-four hours a day, it can be accessed as a tool to seek pleasure and instant gratification for a relatively low cost. Moreover, the ease of meeting one’s needs in the safety of the home is a seductive notion. As the popularity of the Internet increases, excessive use has been labeled a behavioral addiction (Griffiths, 2003). By coupling the gratification of the Internet with the PTSD sufferer’s inclination for addictive behaviors and isolation, the Internet marries two great needs into one perfect addiction.

The purpose of this article is to describe Internet addiction as a possible substitute addiction for PTSD clients. The article will (a) discuss the prevalence of comorbidity of addiction among PTSD clients, (b) provide an overview of Internet addictions, and (c) describe the implications of PTSD clients using Internet addiction as a possible substitute for substance abuse.

Comorbidity of Addiction among PTSD Clients

            Over the years the co-occurrence of addictive behaviors and PTSD has become a more recognized complication for mental health clients. Previous studies have shown that substance abuse among clients with PTSD can be as high as 60-80% (Keane, Gerardi, Lyons & Wolfe, 1988; Kofoed, Freidman, & Peck, 1993).  These high numbers show that PTSD clients are apt to need some type of coping mechanisms, which allow for relief from the symptoms that they experience. Engaging in addictive behaviors can create neurobiological, behavioral, and psychological changes in the individual that mimic substance addictions (Bradley, 1990; Holden, 2001).

            Clients who have a co-occurrence of addictive behaviors and PTSD have a high rate of relapse (Ouimette, Finney, & Moos, 1999). It can be difficult to determine whether the addiction or the PTSD should be the focus of treatment because the client’s low-functioning social skills and difficulty in relating to others exacerbate their need to engage in addictive behaviors (Jordan, Marmar, Fairbank, Schlenger, Kulka, Hough, & Weiss, 1992).  

Overview of Internet Addictions

            Before delving deeper into the issues of PTSD clients and their vulnerability to addictions, it is important to have a better understanding of Internet addictions. Gender attitudes towards Internet usage will be explored as well as the sexual orientation and occupation of said users. To further the readers’ understanding, the implications of over-usage to the individual and their family systems will also be briefly discussed.

            Technology addiction (specifically Internet addiction) is a relatively new phenomenon that has been shelved under the larger category of behavioral addictions (Griffiths, 2003).  The Internet affords its users the same experiences that more tangible addictions, such as substance abuse, can provide. These experiences can include feelings of euphoria and escapism, withdrawal from the outside world, and increasing interpersonal conflict due to the users heightened levels of anxiety or depression (Martin & Petry, 2005).  However, it is important to differentiate between the distinctive subtypes of the “Internet addiction” label.

  • Cyber sexual addictions: compulsive use of adult websites for sexual gratification and internet pornography
  • Internet-relationship addictions: Over-involvement in online relationships, chat rooms, relationships sustained via email
  • Net compulsions: Over usage or obsessive online gambling, shopping or day-trading
  • Information overload: compulsive web surfing or database searches
  • Computer addiction: obsessive computer game playing (e.g., Sims, Doom, Solitaire)

 (Griffiths, 2003; Young, 1999)

Whether the Internet is a means to have certain addictive needs met or is an addiction with multiple avenues of gratification is still up to debate. However, the basic fact remains that the Internet can help people to get their needs met in a potentially unhealthy manner.

Gender.

            Gender attitudes diverge in Internet usage. Women will use the Internet as a means to cultivate connectedness with the world around them, to create attachments that may be lacking in their everyday interactions with others, while men use the internet to “hunt”  for subjects that interest them (Gonyea, 2004; Whitty, 2003). Women who engage in Internet usage and over-usage are often testing out their emotional range in an anonymous environment (Maheu, 1999).  A hypothesis for this phenomenon is that these women perceive that society restricts their emotional range to purposefully avoid emotions such as anger and aggression. Emotional restriction coupled with society’s narrow view of female attractiveness and desirability, deems it logical that women will use the anonymous chat-room environment to engage long-term friendships and intimate relationships (Maheu, 1999; Whitty, 2003).

            Men are more likely to use the Internet for basic gratification (Gonyea, 2004). While women use the Internet to form connections with others, men are more likely to engage in online sexual activity as a distraction from daily life, a means to cope with stress, and for meeting sexual partners (Cooper, Morahan-Martin, Mathy, & Maheu, 2002; Gonyea, 2004). However, men can be under-represented in studies concerning on-line addictions, because they may be less likely than their female counterparts to recognize their internet usage as problematic (Cooper, Delmonico, & Burg, 2000).

Sexual orientation.

            Studies on the sexual orientation of Internet users show that women and homosexuals are more likely to engage in online sexual activities and chat rooms than are heterosexual males and lesbians (Cooper et al., 2000; Cooper et al., 2002). The supposition is that disenfranchised groups, such as women and homosexuals, may feel more comfortable engaging in chat-rooms and sexual activities online due to the anonymous nature of the activity. However, heterosexual males and lesbians may experience greater levels of acceptance in their overall lifestyles and may not need to use the Internet as a coping mechanism (Cooper et al., 2000).

Occupations.

            College students are more likely to engage in Internet addiction than their professional counterparts (Cooper et al., 2000; Young, 2004). Students’ vulnerability to Internet addiction is attributed mainly to their unlimited free access to the internet, large amounts unstructured of time on campus, newly found freedom from parental control, unrestricted access to do or say what they wish online and academia’s encouragement to use the internet as a means of research (Young, 2004).  Those who work at home are also vulnerable to Internet addictions due to their unrestricted access to the Internet with relatively large amounts of private time at home. Interestingly, those whose jobs involve computers exclusively are much less likely to engage in excessive amounts of inappropriate Internet usage (Cooper et al., 2002).

Implications to self and others.

            Excessive Internet usage may cause individuals to have difficulty in their social networks. Internet addicts must work hard to maintain an illusion of normalcy to the outside world. Addicts will hide their usage from others, changing their behaviors in order to get the time that they need on the Internet. An addict can spend up to 80 hours per week on the Internet. In order to facilitate these prolonged hours, the user may forego sleep or begin taking caffeine pills in order to stay awake. Loss of sleep can leave users susceptible to fatigue and illness as well as impair their ability to be effective in their daily life. Other health risks may include a sedentary lifestyle and increased risk for carpal tunnel syndrome (Young, 2004).

            Eventually the addiction will become noticeable to those who are close to the addict, no matter how the user attempts to hide their usage. The individual will become increasingly asocial, and when social encounters do occur, the user may manifest tension and fatigue. These symptoms may occur due to the user’s intense need to fulfill the craving to be on the Internet. The need to be on the Internet becomes less about being on the computer and more about using it as a tool to find a means of escape or to cope with life stress (Young, 2004).

            As the user’s behavior becomes more erratic, and the need to use the computer becomes more pronounced, the user’s family and friends will become increasingly aware that something is wrong with the addict. The impact to the social network can be that of concern, confusion, and withdrawal. The Internet can become a means of virtual support and release for the user; thus making the living system obsolete. The individual’s social networks may withdrawal from the user and inadvertently increase the user’s need to cope with the loss.

Implications of PTSD Client Using Internet as a Substitute Addiction

            Using the Internet as a means of escape and coping is currently not as stigmatized as other addictive behaviors. For example, there are ongoing campaigns and public service announcements to educate the public about excessive drug and alcohol abuse but no warnings about excessive Internet usage. Connectedness to the outside world via the Internet is the norm, considering the public is inundated with new and better technology such as cell phones and personal digital assistants that allow people to get onto the Internet virtually anywhere. Because the Internet has not been thought of as a high threat, research around PTSD clients using the Internet is not well researched.

 Internet addiction is a behavioral addiction and not a substance addiction and is not necessarily regarded with the same amount of seriousness. Because of the previously held belief that only a foreign substance could create chemical changes and dependencies in the brain, substance addiction has been considered far more harmful than behavioral addictions (Martin, & Petry, 2005). However, both substance and behavioral addictions have the power to create behavioral, neurobiological and psychological changes in the individual, making all types of addictions detrimental (Bradley, 1990; Holden, 2001; Martin, & Petry, 2005).

Behavioral changes.

Behavioral addictions can transform basic drives for survival, such as sleep, into actions that are counterproductive to survival, such as spending four hours per night on Internet gambling. Similar to the cocaine addict who foregoes sleep to find the means for their next high, a behavioral addict will sacrifice sleep in order to maintain the hours needed on the Internet to get their cravings met. Individuals are identified as an “addict” when survival instincts are interrupted to the point that the new behavior interferes with quality of life (Martin, & Petry, 2005).

Neurobiological changes.

When the individual is occupied with repetitive activity, such as Internet surfing, a dopamine reaction begins to occur in the brain. Dopamine, a chemical produced in the body, affects brain processes that control movement, emotional response, and ability to experience pleasure and pain (University of Texas at Austin, 2005). As the individual uses the Internet, a certain level of dopamine will allow them to experience pleasure and arousal (Holden, 2001). As the individual builds up a resistance to the chemical, they need greater amounts of time for the activity to get the same high.

Psychological changes.

            Increased emotional arousal from engaging in behavioral addictions is a prominent psychological change. The individual will feel a high level of anticipation while engaging in the act, and then experience a feeling of euphoria during and immediately after the need has been fulfilled (Bradley, 1990). Feelings of remorse and guilt will then replace the elation. Mood swings are another emotion response that can occur when the individual is deprived of their Internet cravings. A person can become hostile and angry as they go into withdrawal (Bradley, 1990).

Treatment for PTSD Clients Manifesting an Internet Addiction

Treatment for clients with both PTSD and an Internet addiction should address the behavioral, neurobiological, and psychological needs of the client. The goal for these clients should be the lessening of symptoms of both diagnoses. Traditionally, clients with PTSD and addiction diagnoses have been treated with individual therapy, in therapeutic support groups and with pharmacotherapy (Brady et al., 2004). 

While established treatments may work for clients with Internet addictions, the problem remains that the Internet is a prominent fixture in today’s world. Therapists working with this population need to be aware of the potential temptations that the client will come into contact with daily. A client’s daily routine may involve technology that will help them access the Internet. Some suggestions for tailoring treatment to the Internet addicted client:

Encourage client to remove Internet access from their home. Similar to a therapist suggesting that alcoholics remove alcohol from their home, the therapist should contract with the client to remove the temptation of internet access. The intervention could utilize family members to facilitate the removal process.

Crisis intervention and support services should be made available to the client. Moments of weakness and temptation will tempt the client to use the Internet. Providing the client an opportunity to work through a crisis with some help can circumvent a relapse. Because Internet addiction is relatively new, crisis services may need to be provided in community agencies.

Maintaining new behaviors and preventing relapses should be supported. After clients have concluded services it is important that they feel comfortable accessing help when it is necessary. Scheduling check-in visits at intermittent times, such as every six months, can help to maintain new patterns of functioning. The client should be encouraged to come back for services if they feel that their overall functioning is not optimal.

Suggestions for the Counseling Profession

            There are multiple resources for people who manifest symptoms of PTSD and Internet addiction. These resources come in the form of treatment facilities, counseling clinics, and private therapists. When a client is seeking counseling services, there are usually credentialing bodies that maintain certification for a facility, such as the Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF). In private practice, counselors display degrees that signify they are legitimate and competent members of the profession.

            As the worldwide web gets bigger and more people seek information about various mental illnesses, there is an increased need for trustworthy sources of information. One of the ways that the counseling profession can meet this need is the creation of a centralized website about mental illnesses. A website endorsed by a professional organization, such as the American Counseling Association, may be perceived as more trustworthy than a website that is maintained by a private organization. (Example websites: Appendix A)

Conclusion

            Clients with PTSD comprise 15% of the overall American population (Kessler et al., 1995). Among these clients, 60-80% engages in addictive behaviors that can further impede overall functioning (Keane et al., 1988; Kofoed, et al. 1993). Substance addiction among PTSD clients has been documented but behavioral addictions, specifically Internet addiction, have not.

The Internet has a prominent place in our society today. It is projected that there are over one billion users in 2005 alone (ET Forecasts.com, 2001). Because it is so readily available, people have developed ways to use the Internet in an unhealthy manner. Misuse of the Internet can be categorized into five parts: cyber sexual addictions, internet-relationship addictions, net compulsion, information overload, and computer addiction (Griffiths, 2003; Young, 1999).

Because Internet addiction is considered a behavioral addiction, some question the level of danger it poses to the individual. However, a behavioral addict can manifest behavioral, neurobiological, and psychological impairment just as a substance abuse addict can (Bradley, 1990; Holden, 2001; Martin, & Petry, 2005). While traditional treatments can include individual therapy, pharmacotherapy, and therapeutic support groups, modifications are required to meet the specific needs of the PTSD client with an Internet addiction.

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual for mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.) Washington, DC: Author.

Bradley, B. P. (1990). Behavioural addictions: Common features and treatment implications. British Journal of Addiction, 85, 1417-1419.

Brady, K. T., Back, S. E., & Coffey, S. F. (2004). Substance abuse and posttraumatic stress disorder. American Psychological Society, 13(5), 206-209.

Brown, P. J. & Ouimette, P. C. (1999). Introduction to the special section on substance use disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder comorbidity. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 13(2), 75-77.

Cooper, A. (1998a). Sexuality and the internet: Surfing into the new millennium. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1(2), 181-187.

Cooper, A., Delmonico, D. L., &Burg, R. (2000). Cybersex users, abusers and compulsives: New findings and implications. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 7, 5-29.

Cooper, A., Morahan-Martin, J., Mathy, R. M., & Maheu, M. (2002). Towards an increased understanding of user demographics in online sexual activities. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 28, 105-129.

ET Forecasts.com (2001, February 6). Internet users will surpass 1 billion in 2005. Buffalo Grove, IL: Author. Retrieved March 7, 2005, from http://www.etforecasts.com/products/ES_pcww1203.htm

 Gonyea, J. L. J. (2004). Internet sexuality: Clinical implications for couples. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 32, 375-390.

Griffiths, M. (2003). Internet gambling: Issues, concerns, and recommendations. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6(6), 557-568.

Holden, C. (2001). ‘Behavioral’ addictions: Do they exist? Science, 294 (5544).

Jordan, B. K., Marmar, C. R., Fairbank, J. A., Schlenger, W. E., Kulka, R. A., Hough, R., L., & Weiss, D. S. (1992). Problems in families of male Vietnam veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 60(6), 916-926.

Keane, T. M., Gerardi, R. J., Lyons, J. A., & Wolfe, J. (1988). The interrelationship of substance abuse and posttraumatic stress disorder: Epidemiological and clinical considerations. In M. Galanter (Ed.), Recent developments in alcoholism (pp. 27-48). New York, NY: Plenum.

Kessler, R. C., Sonnega, A., Bromet, E., Hughes, M., & Nelson, C. B., (1995). Posttraumatic stress disorder in the national comorbidity survey. Archives of General Psychiatry, 52, 1048-1060.

Kofoed, L., Friedman, M. J. M., & Peck, R. (1993). Alcoholism and drug abuse in patients with PTSD. Psychiatric Quarterly, 64, pg 151-171.

Maheu, M. (1999). Women’s internet behavior: Providing psychotherapy offline and online for cyber-infidelity. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Conference, Boston, MA.

Martin, P. R. & Petry, N. M. (2005). Are non-substance-related addictions really addictions? The American Journal on Addictions, 14, 1-7.

Ouimette, P. C., Finney, J. W., & Moos, R. H. (1999). Two-year posttreatment functioning and coping of substance abuse patients with posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 13(2), 105-114.

University of Texas at Austin (2005). Dopamine affects brain processes that control movement, emotional response, and the ability to experience pleasure and pain.  Retrieved March 12, 2005, from http://www.utexas.edu/research/asrec/dopamine_p.html

Whitty, M. T. (2003). Pushing the wrong buttons: Men’s and women’s attitudes towards online and offline infidelity. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6(6), 569-579.

Young, K. (1999). Internet addiction: Evaluation and treatment. Student British Medical Journal, 7, 351-351.

Young, K. S. (2004). Internet addiction: A new clinical phenomenon and its consequences. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(4), 402-415.

Young, K. S., Griffen-Shelley, E., Cooper, A., O’Mara, J., & Buchanan, J. (2000). Online infidelity: A new dimension in couple relationships and implication for evaluation and treatment. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 7, 59-74.


 

Author's Biography

 

Elizabeth R. O’Brien is a Doctoral Student in the Department of Child, Family, and Community Sciences-Counselor Education at The University of Central Florida. Correspondence can be directed to erobrie@mailbox.sc.edu


Appendix A

 

Websites on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder:

http://www.ncptsd.va.gov

www.ptsdalliance.org

 

Websites on Internet Addiction:

www.netaddiction.com

www.virtualaddiction.com

 

Self-Assessments for Internet Addiction:

www.stresscure.com/hrn/addiction.html

www.addictions.org/internet.htm

www.uml.edu/student-services/counseling/internet