Technology continues to evolve and has had a
seemingly unabated influence on how we learn, communicate, and interact
with others both professionally and personally. Today’s high tech tools,
high speed networks, and fast-paced digital exchanges are more an
intricate part of our global society than ever before (Friedman, 2005).
The school counseling profession is no exception and must also evolve to
keep pace with our dynamic and rapidly changing world. Yet, even though
the profession has developed exponentially in recent years, we have
perhaps underutilized technology as a tool to improve our school
counseling programs (Baker, 2001). Since school counselors play an
important role in shaping students’ ability to learn, communicate, and
share information with others, school counselors would be well served to
understand how technology can enhance their work. As Sabella (2003)
points out, “for better or worse, computers are changing the ways in
which we conduct our work, interact, and especially make decisions” (pg.
212).
The
Potential of School Counseling Technology
Van Horn & Myrick (2001)
suggested that the work of counselors’ in the areas of distance learning,
college and career searching, counseling interventions, training and
supervision, networking and support systems, and information retrieval
and dissemination is affected by technology. For example, by creating
multimedia presentations that can be distributed over the Internet,
school counselors can increase the speed by which information is
communicated to large quantities of people. Sabella and Booker (2003)
wrote about how to use technology to promote a guidance and counseling
program among stakeholders. The authors suggested that using technology
may have many potential advantages, such as the ability for information
to be instantaneously updated and received by all stakeholders in a cost
effective manner, enhanced collaboration capabilities, and the ability to
present visually appealing, informative, and creative presentations.
To better conceptualize the wide
ranging potentials for how technology can help school counselors in
particular, Sabella (2003) provided a useful categorization scheme which
can help thinking about how to use and implement technology. Technology
can help counselors in one or more of four areas:
1. Information/Resource: In
the form of words, graphics, video, and even three-dimension virtual
environments, the Web remains a dynamic and rapidly growing library of
information and knowledge.
2. Communication/Collaboration:
Chat rooms, bulletin boards, virtual classroom environments, video
conferencing, online conferences, electronic meeting services, e-mail –
the web is now a place where people connect, exchange information, and
make shared decisions.
3. Interactive/Productivity tools:
The maturing of software and web-based programming has launched a new
level of available tools off the shelves and on the Net. These
technology tools can help counselors build and create anything ranging
from a personalized business card to a set of personalized website
links. Interactive tools help counselors to process data and manipulate
information such as calculating a GPA or the rate of inflation, convert
text to speech, create a graph, or even determine the interactive
effects of popular prescription drugs.
4. Delivery of services: Most
controversial, yet growing in popularity, is how counselors use the web
to meet with clients and deliver counseling services in an online or
“virtual” environment.
How Are
School Counselors Actually Using Technology?
A review of the relevant
literature does include some examples of how school counselors are using
technology, although many (if not most) of the examples are clearly
dated. For instance, counselors who have used computers to assist them in
their work have done so in areas such as computer-assisted live
supervision (Froehle, 1984; Neukrug, 1991); discussions of counseling
issues with other counselors (Rust, 1995); supervision (Myrick & Sabella,
1995); advocacy (Stone & Turba, 1999); counselor training (Cairo & Kanner,
1984); school counseling program promotion (Sabella & Booker, 2003); as
part of counselor interventions with children (D'Andrea, 1995; Glover,
1995; Shulman, Sweeney, & Gerler, 1995) and counseling simulations (Sharf
& Lucas, 1993). Probably the most extensive use of computers in
counseling so far has been in the area of career development and guidance
(e.g., Bobek, Robbins, Gore, Harris-Bowlsbey, Lapan, Dahir, & Jensen,
2005; Chapman & Katz, 1983; Friery & Nelson, 2004; Haring-Hidore, 1984;
Harris, 1972; Katz & Shatkin, 1983; Kivlighan, Johnston, Hogan, & Mauer,
1994; Pyle, 1984).
Computer, networking, and other
technologies have rapidly changed in recent years. However, knowledge of
how school counselors can use existing and emerging technologies is
substantially absent in the professional literature.
Why is
Technology Important for School Counselors?
Most counselors would agree that
they perceive themselves as having to meet increasing workloads with
either the same or reduced resources - that is, they are having to "do
more with less." Thus, the common cry among counselors is "How can I
provide quality services and programs (i.e., continue to be effective)
for my students in a more efficient manner?" The appropriate use of
technology (e.g., productivity software) is one viable solution for
dealing with this problem. The necessity for a comprehensive and
integrated approach to counseling, including accountability, has become
increasingly important, especially as fewer counselors are working with
increasing numbers of clients in all sectors. Without help, counselors
may feel overwhelmed, unorganized, or lost as a result of the sheer
quantity of information they need to manage. Consequently, effectiveness
and motivation may suffer. Technology tools have the potential to make
some aspects of the counselor's role more efficient, accurate, and
automated (Tyler & Sabella, 2004). This is especially true in a
profession that is dealing with very high numbers of students per school
counselor. For instance, on the average, the school counselor in an
American public school is responsible for counseling 488 students
(American School Counselor Association, n.d.) although a great deal of
variance exists. In 2004-2005 school year, the average
student-to-counselor ratio was 951:1 in California. In Wyoming and
Louisiana, the student-to-counselor ratio was 218:1. To implement
effective school counseling programs, the recommended minimum
student-to-counselor ratio is 250:1 (American School Counselor
Association, 2003). Technology has the potential to help counselors
manage large caseloads more efficiently while working on reducing the
student-to-counselor ratios to more reasonable levels.
Technological competency has
also become an ethical issue, one that strikes at the core of competency
and student safety. The ASCA Ethical Standards section on Professional
competence section E.1. (Professional Competence, section “c” states that
the professional school counselor “strives through personal initiative to
maintain professional competence including technological literacy and to
keep abreast of professional information. Professional and personal
growth are ongoing throughout the counselor’s career.” It is also the
position of ASCA that:
Professional school counselors collaborate with parents and educators to
promote awareness of high-tech dangers among students and cultivate
personal safety and security skills related to technology usage.
Professional school counselors maintain a basic level of technological
literacy which, coupled with expertise in human development, allows them
to provide educators and parents with guidelines for the appropriate use
of technology by students. (ASCA, 2006, The Professional School
Counselor’s Role,¶ 4)
To efficiently and effectively
serve students, school counselors should be armed with the same
technological resources to which their students often have access. This
enables counselors to communicate with students and parents on such
issues as college and career exploration, two topics central to a high
school counselor's role. In 1984, 27 percent of high school students used
computers to locate career information. This increased to over 57 percent
in 2002 (National Center for Education Statistics, 2003). Over the past
decade, many computer-assisted career guidance systems have been
developed and shown to be effective in promoting career development and
exploration (Bobek et al, 2005). Children are surrounded by technology
today, and technology is a more integral part of their daily lives than
it is for most adults. Avoiding or ignoring technology in our profession
will continually diminish our abilities to do our work in a timely and
effective manner. Eventually, the “low-tech” school counselor will face
ethical issues, such as functioning within the boundaries of individual
professional competence. Counselors who decide to "opt out" of
information technology such as the Internet will essentially be working
with students and parents who will perceive them to live in a world that
no longer exists.
Overall, one would be
hard-pressed to find any aspect of our modern lives that is not being
affected by the rapidly expanding enterprise of computer-related
technology (CRT). Lindsay (1988) wrote, "Computer technology has
revolutionized many aspects of our society and is without a doubt the
most significant innovation of the century." It is, therefore, inevitable
that computer technology is changing the counseling profession as well.
As Sampson, Kolodinsky, and Greeno (1997) point out, "During the past 30
years, computer applications have become an increasingly common resource
used in the delivery of counseling services" (p. 203). The future holds
only more changes and developments that promise to create new
opportunities (and challenges) for how we work, live, and play. Whether
we like it or not, information technologies are now essential tools for
manipulating ideas and images and for communicating effectively with
others - all central components of a counselor's job (Sabella, 1998).
The
ASCA Model as an Organizing Framework
The American School Counselor
Association’s (ASCA) National Model provides a framework by which
counselors can design, coordinate, implement, manage and evaluate their
school counseling programs (American School Counselor Association,
2003). The ASCA National Model is composed of four interdependent
elements representing the structure of the model: foundation, delivery
system, management system, and accountability. Each component is critical
to the overall organization of the model, but the delivery system speaks
to how the school counseling program is organized to provide programs and
services to students. The delivery system’s four components, guidance
curriculum, individual student planning, responsive services, and systems
support, describe how the counseling program is structured to provide the
needed programs and services to students and the larger school
community.
The current study sought to analyze data previously collected
by Sabella (2005) to describe the various ways school counselors used
technology. The ASCA National Model’s Delivery System components were
used as an organizing framework to categorize the qualitative data.
Specifically, this study sought to answer the following research
questions: Are counselors using technology to implement all four
components of the ASCA National Model’s delivery system? Of the four
components of the ASCA National Model’s delivery system, is technology
use in one component more prevalent than in the other three components?
Method
The data for this study were
obtained from an open-ended electronic survey. Sabella (2005) collected
data by soliciting participation via e-mail from approximately 18,000
school counselors who subscribe to the SchoolCounselor.com eNewsletter.
Using an open-ended survey question, he asked participants to communicate
how and for what purpose they used technology in their professional
work. Participants were encouraged to report ways they used technology
to make their work more effective, efficient, or more enjoyable.
Forty-nine (49) people responded
to the survey, including people who worked as school counselors, career
counselors, or program coordinators for non-profit organizations
providing contract counselors to public schools. Approximately 90
percent of the respondents were from either the United States or Ontario,
Canada (N=44). Ten percent (N=5) did not indicate where they lived. No
other demographic data were collected. Participants’ responses were used
in more than one category when appropriate. One respondent replied with
information she had recently learned in an online course, rather than
information about how she had implemented technology in her professional
life; therefore, her response was not included in the analyses.
After reading respondents’
answers, the data were analyzed on two levels. First, the delivery system
component for each technology application respondents mentioned
was determined. After the data were coded by delivery system component,
common themes among the respondents’ answers within these four components
were identified. To increase internal validity, the data were coded and
categorized three separate times by the first author without referring to
a reflexive log in which all decisions were recorded. Next, the data were
analyzed independently by two of the researchers to place respondent
statements into codes. The inter-rater reliability among the researchers
was 92%. For each code, 100% agreement among the researchers was
required before the final categorization of each disputed code.
Results
School counselors reported using
technology in each of the four components of the ASCA National Model’s
Delivery System, particularly within the school guidance curriculum and
system support components. Figure 1 presents the frequency respondents
reported using technology in each of the four delivery system components,
and Figure 2 reports respondents’ use of technology by the specific codes
and categories created by the researchers.
Figure 1.
Number of times technology use in each Delivery System component was
mentioned by respondents
Components of the
Delivery System
(Reported frequency with
which counselors’ use technology in each component)
|
|
School Guidance
Curriculum |
Individual Student
Planning |
Responsive Services |
System Support |
|
Frequency
|
34 |
21 |
4 |
33 |
Figure 2.
Breakdown of codes used
within each Delivery System component
School Guidance
Curriculum
|
Increase students’
depth of understanding |
11 |
|
Increase students’
exposure to material |
13 |
|
Deliver information
to parents |
10 |
Individual Student
Planning
|
Increase
communication |
5 |
|
Advising |
2 |
|
Efficiency |
14 |
Responsive Counseling
|
Peer facilitation |
1 |
|
Responsive
counseling |
3 |
System Support
|
Document and
demonstrate accountability |
10 |
|
Increase access to
material |
7 |
|
Save time |
16 |
School
Guidance Curriculum
School counselors reported using
technology as it relates to school guidance curriculum in three major
areas: increasing students’ depth of understanding of material,
increasing students’ exposure to material, and communicating with
parents. In most situations, technology was used to increase students’
depth of understanding and exposure to material in college awareness,
career awareness, and classroom instruction. Counselors reported using
technology for school guidance curriculum 34 times, making this the
delivery system component in which technology was used the most
frequently.
Using technology to increase students’ depth of
understanding.
Many
school counselors reported using technology to increase students’ depth
of understanding of possible occupations, colleges, and classroom
instruction. Technology allowed them to e-mail businesses, access
Internet sites, and extract information that is otherwise difficult to
obtain. One school counselor used the Internet to encourage students to
explore potential careers and provide in-depth reports of the careers
they choose to explore. She stated:
I have
a PowerPoint that addresses the big idea “Why People Work”. I videotaped
5 workers in my school and inserted these 45 second responses to a few
key questions into my PowerPoint. It’s like having 5 guest speakers in 5
minutes…I particularly like it because you can select certain people to
video to challenge gender stereotypes about occupations.
Regarding classroom instruction, another female counselor
used technology with her elementary school students by graphing the
responses to anger management interviews with community workers and
exploring ways to cope with anger. She required students to pick a topic
in which they were interested, research it, and “create a full
presentation which must include a technology component…the students love
the technology tools and put together great presentations.”
Using technology to increase students’
exposure to material.
School counselors used technology to e-mail scholarship information to
students, conduct college searches via the Internet, explore the college
application process, and provide on-line access to classroom notes so
that absent students could obtain the material they missed. One counselor
ran a 15 minute live television show in homeroom everyday focused on her
guidance curriculum and announcements. This enabled her to deliver
material to the whole school and address current topics in a timely
manner.
Another school counselor provided an example of how school
counselors can use technology to increase students’ awareness of college
exploration tools. “Using the college’s classroom laptops, the students
visited websites such as CSU Mentor and began looking at the online
application process for FAFSA.”
Using technology to deliver information to
parents. Respondents reported using
technology to communicate with parents about school-related programs and
opportunities, and to deliver important information to families in a
reader-friendly and accessible way. Many counselors reported using web
pages to deliver timely academic information. One counselor stated, “I
plan to show these results [graphs showing range of GPA, SAT scores, and
class ranks of senior students accepted into particular colleges] on a
PowerPoint presentation to our seniors and their parents on college
night.”
One school was preparing to convert to online grade cards
unless a waiver was signed articulating that a parent lacked access to
technology. A counselor at this school stated most parents do not
currently use INTOUCH, the school’s medium to provide parents with
information regarding grades, attendance, and other information. By
eliminating paper copies of grade cards, she hoped to increase parent
involvement in technology.
Individual student planning
School counselors reported using technology with individual
student planning to improve communication, advising, and efficiency.
Respondents articulated using technology for individual student planning
21 times.
Using technology to improve communication.
One
school counselor used a computerized translation device to communicate
with a French-speaking student. Although she reported that the
translation was not entirely accurate, the technology facilitated rapport
between the student and counselor. Another counselor reported using the
Internet to communicate with students about how to improve their grades.
Using technology for advising. One school counselor
reported using technology when advising students on college and career
selections based on interest inventories. Another counselor used
technology by providing current seniors with graphs indicating GPA, SAT
scores, and class ranks of previous seniors accepted into particular
colleges to aid students’ college selection processes.
Using technology for efficiency. Respondents reported an increase in the efficiency in
which they engaged in the administrative aspects of their profession. One
counselor programmed 270 eighth grade students for ninth grade in 70
minutes by using closed circuit television. Other counselors reported
using Microsoft Excel™ to track students’ grades.
Responsive services
Responsive services were addressed through technology in two
areas: peer facilitation and individual counseling. Counselors reported
using technology in this area four times.
Using technology for peer facilitation. In this study, peer facilitation is
categorized as a responsive service because it refers to a program that
responds to identified student needs. One school counselor reported a
“mail bonding” program she implemented to create a partnership between
her students and college fraternity men:
We
identified twelve “at risk” boys…I had just won a computer through a
grant, and enlisted my son’s fraternity to act as e-mail buddies for
these kids. Their behavior improved dramatically since they didn’t want
their buddy to know that they were making bad choices.
Using technology for responsive counseling. Two school counselors reported using
technology to reduce students’ anxiety. An elementary school counselor
used technology to “reduce new student anxiety…through e-mail with the
previous school teachers and/or counselors.” She allowed new students to
electronically send messages to their old teachers, who in turn delivered
them to their old friends who did not have access to e-mail.
Responsive counseling often requires information to be
transferred quickly, such as in an emergency. One school counselor used a
three-way call translation service to communicate with non-English
speaking parents when their child threatened to commit suicide at school.
The same three-way call translation service was also used to communicate
quickly about logistical issues.
System support
Three patterns emerged from school counselors’ reported use
of technology for system support: documenting and demonstrating
accountability, increasing access to material, and saving time.
Counselors reported using technology for this delivery system component
33 times.
Using technology to document and demonstrate
accountability.
Respondents reported that computer software applications such as
Microsoft Access, Microsoft Excel™, SCAATAP, and Microsoft Outlook
facilitated their accountability-related efforts. Using an Access
database, for example, school counselors stated they could compare data
across schools. School counselors also used websites to increase
accountability through online surveys. One counselor reported:
I have
developed an on-line survey tool that complies with No Child Left Behind
required data for each senior in our high school. Pie charts, percentages
of post-high school plans, and much more are available as well as nice
data to present to administrators and Boards of Education.
Using technology to increase access to
materials. Through Microsoft Outlook,
websites, e-mail, Access, staff servers, and PDAs, school counselors
reported using technology to increase access to materials regarding
professional development, consultation among professionals, and program
management. “I have created a ‘folder’… in our Microsoft Outlook based
intranet for often used staff forms and documents,” reported one
counselor. Another school counselor stated “we also have Palms that are
loaded with our students’ information…our school has around 1500 students
and often you know a name and a face, but not together.”
Using technology to save time. School counselors reported using technology to create
quick and convenient systems of data collection to free time for other
obligations. For example, one counselor stated “I maintain a ‘Teacher
Links‘ intranet that puts information in the hands of teachers and
administrators at a moment’s notice.” Another counselor articulated how
Microsoft Word™ enabled her to save time collecting information about
accommodations for students:
A month
before testing comes I collect information about accommodations for
students that I need to know in order to plan for testing. I use a table
in Word because I can sort the table in so many ways…Once we test in the
Fall, all I have to do is modify the list for the tests that come up
during the rest of the year.
Discussion
Respondents in this study reported that technology positively
affected their work in each of the four ASCA National Model delivery
system components. Within the school guidance curriculum, school
counselors reported using technology to increase students’ depth of
understanding of material, increase students’ exposure to material, and
communicate with parents. These factors enrich students’ academic lives
because they facilitate deeper and more complete knowledge about issues
of which they might not otherwise be aware. Most colleges offer virtual
tours, or at least offer detailed information about their institutions,
on their websites. Since students may attend college far away from home,
they may see their college for the first time only when they begin their
Freshman year. Using the Internet to research colleges, students learn
how to access information and apply it to their own decision making.
Communicating with parents via e-mail is a form of asynchronous
communication, allowing counselors to generate and respond to e-mail
requests when they do not have other more immediate concerns. This
facilitates overall communication with parents by helping them stay
informed of their child’s progress without having to schedule conferences
or phone calls.
The second component of the delivery system, individual
student planning, was facilitated by technology in three ways by the
respondents in this study: communication, advising, and efficiency. Van
Horn and Myrick (2001) asserted in their study of school counselors’
technology use that technology helped increase communication between
parents and students, a finding echoed by the results of this study.
Since language barriers between counselors and their students are
problematic in many schools, the report from the counselor in this study
who used technology to overcome the language barrier she was experiencing
is particularly interesting, and is just one example of how technology,
when combined with a need, can solve practical problems.
Regarding responsive services, peer facilitation and
responsive counseling were facilitated with specific technology
applications – most notably, e-mail. Using e-mail to communicate with
peers allowed students to interact with people outside of their schools
and communities, possibly providing them with a different viewpoint on
particular issues. Creating a faceless environment via e-mail might
facilitate the provision of counseling services to students who feel more
comfortable expressing themselves via a computer than in a more
traditional face-to-face environment. However, the provision of
counseling services via the Internet needs to be done cautiously, and
within ethical guidelines provided by professional associations. For
examples of ethical guidelines regarding technology and counseling
services on the Internet, see section A.10 of the Ethical Standards for
School Counselors (American School Counselor Association, 2004),
and The Practice of Internet Counseling (National Board for Certified
Counselors, 2005).
Systems support activities were facilitated by technology in
three areas: documenting and demonstrating accountability, increasing
access to material, and saving time. Accountability is a critical issue
when working in a school environment, and using specific software and
websites enabled the respondents in this study to have credible
information to accompany their decision-making. Another critical issue
is the amount of time that school counselors spend on administrative
tasks. Creating spreadsheets, documents, and websites with commonly used
forms enabled school counselors in this study to save time on
administrative tasks and spend more time on college awareness, career
awareness, and responsive services for students.
Across
the delivery system’s four components, school counselors stated that
technology has improved their professional work. The results of this
study confirm prior research findings that technology is an enabler,
allowing for more efficient counseling (Van Horn & Myrick, 2001; Bobek et
al, 2005). Although all responses, when taken together, suggest that
technology enhances counselors’ professional work, many counselors did
not indicate using technology across all four ASCA National Model
delivery system components.
A strength of this study is that it disaggregates data on
counselors’ technology use by the four components of ASCA’s National
Model’s delivery system. This should allow researchers and professional
development providers to identify areas counselors are using technology
to better focus their efforts. The lack of research on this topic,
coupled with the lack of relevant technology training in many school
systems, calls for a reassessment of where schools are placing their
limited resources for school counselors. More professional development
work focused on increasing school counselors’ familiarity with and
understanding of how technology can assist them in their professional
work is necessary. Additionally, school counselors need continuous
access to an Internet-connected computer to fully reap the benefits of
technology. Therefore, it is imperative that counselors have a computer
in their offices on which they can organize student information and use
the Internet.
One limitation of this study is that the sample obtained was
a selective group of people. Sabella (2005) invited the 18,000
subscribers of his newsletter to share how they are using technology, and
only 49 people responded, yielding a response rate of less than one
percent. Therefore, this study may be an example of homogenous sampling
because the sample was a self-selected subgroup of the population of
school counselors who subscribe to this newsletter. Since this is an
online newsletter, the readers may be more technology-savvy than school
counselors who do not read the newsletter. Clearly, our sample is not
representative of all school counselors.
Future Directions in School Counseling Technology
Future research could address the differences in how school
counselors use technology across the elementary, middle, and high school
levels. For example, Owen and Weikel (1999) found that counselors working
in middle schools and secondary schools used computers more frequently
than counselors working in elementary schools. The limited research on
this subject does not provide enough knowledge to understand why and how
the differences exist among the different levels of school counseling
practice. By disaggregating the use of technology among counselors by
grade level, research could assess what factors influence middle and high
school counselors to use technology more than elementary school
counselors. It would also be interesting to determine if differences in
technology use among younger and older counselors actually exist, or if
this common belief is a myth. Since technology use has boomed over the
past couple of decades, it is possible that younger counselors feel more
comfortable navigating the Internet or using Microsoft Office products
than do older counselors. It would also be interesting to examine if the
availability and/or use of technology increases the effectiveness of
implementing the ASCA National Model delivery system in schools of
varying socioeconomic levels. Counselors working in schools that have
high socioeconomic levels may benefit from using technology because many
students and parents have access to technology in their homes. In this
situation, counselors, students, and parents have similar levels of
access to technology. On the other hand, counselors, students, and
parents in schools that have lower socioeconomic levels might not have
the same level of access to technology. In this case, students and
parents might benefit from their counselors’ understanding and use of
technology because they do not have access to technology themselves.
Their counselor could locate documents and important forms, research
college and career options, and serve as a liaison between students and
the Internet. Perhaps future research could also identify some of the
many factors influencing school counselors’ use of technology so that our
profession can more fully benefit from the emerging and available
technology.
Owen & Weikel (1999) found that 88 percent of school
counselors report having an assigned computer in school to support the
counseling program. Through a 7-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1
(lacking all confidence) to 7 (having total and complete confidence), the
researchers asked respondents to indicate the degree to which they felt
confident using a computer. The mean score was 4.86, suggesting that
school counselors can benefit from further professional development with
technology applications. Given the rapid growth of technology, would
this finding still be true if the same study were conducted today? What
would school counselors across the country say about their confidence for
using technology at this time? Indeed, if the levels of technological
competency (and literacy) among school counselors were better known,
professional development opportunities that are more focused and
meaningful could be developed.
Overall, acquiring and becoming proficient in using
technology tools comes at a price in the form of both financial and human
resources. Yet, the significant demands of the school counselor’s job and
the fact that we now live in a high-tech world makes using technology
imperative. The school counseling profession must continue to understand
how particular technologies may be best suited for effectively fulfilling
our unique duties within the high-pressured and high-stakes world of
education.
References
American School Counselor Association (2003). The ASCA
national model: A framework for school counseling programs. Alexandria,
Va: Author.
American School Counselor Association (2004). Ethical
standards for school counselors. Retrieved August 24, 2006 from
http://www.schoolcounselor.org/content.asp?contentid=173
American School Counselor Association (2006). Position
statement: The professional school counselor and student safety and
technology. Available online
http://www.schoolcounselor.org/content.asp?contentid=221
American School Counselor Association (n.d.).
Student-to-Counselor Ratios. Retrieved January 3, 2007 from
http://www.schoolcounselor.org/content.asp?contentid=460
http://www.schoolcounselor.org/content.asp?pl=325&sl=133&contentid=133.
Baker, S. B. (2001). Reflections on forty years in the school
counseling profession: Is the glass half full or half empty? Professional
School Counseling, 5(2), 75-83.
Bobek, B. L., Robbins, S. B., Gore, P. A., Harris-Bowlsbey,
J., Lapan, R. T., Dahir, C. A., & Jepsen, D. A. (2005). Training
Counselors to use computer-assisted career guidance systems more
effectively: a model curriculum. Career Development Quarterly, 53, pg.
363–371.
Cairo, P. C., & Kanner, M. S. (1984). Investigating the
effects of computerized approaches to counselor training. Counselor
Education and Supervision, 24, 212-221.
Chapman, W., & Katz, M. R. (1983). Career information systems
in the secondary schools: A survey and assessment. Vocational Guidance
Quarterly, 32, 165-177.
D’Andrea, M. (1995). Using computer technology to promote
multicultural awareness among elementary school-age students. Elementary
School Guidance & Counseling, 30(1), p. 45-55.
Friedman, T.L. (2005). The World Is Flat: A Brief History of
the Twenty-First Century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Friery, K. & Nelson, J. G. (2004). Using technology to
develop a high school career awareness workshop: The REACH program.
TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, Vol. 48(6),
p. 40-42.
Froehle, T. C. (1984). Computer-assisted feedback in
counseling supervision. Counselor Education and Supervision, 24, 168-175.
Glover, B. L. (1995). DINOS (drinking is not our solution):
Using computer programs in middle school drug education. Elementary
School Guidance & Counseling, 30, 55-62.
Haring-Hidore, M. (1984). In pursuit of students who do not
use computers for career guidance. Journal of Counseling and Development,
63, 139-140.
Harris, J. (1972). Computer-assisted guidance systems.
Washington, DC: National Vocational Guidance Association.
Katz, M. R., & Shatkin, L. (1983). Characteristics of
computer-assisted guidance. The Counseling Psychologist, 11(4), 15-31.
Kivlighan, D. M., Jr., Johnston, J. A., Hogan, R. S., & Mauer,
E. (1994). Who benefits from computerized career counseling? Journal of
Counseling & Development, 72, 289-292.
Lindsay, G. (1988). Techniques and technology-Strengthening
the counseling profession via computer use: Responding to the issues. The
School Counselor, 35, 325- 330.
Myrick, R.D, & Sabella, R.A. (1995). Cyberspace: New place
for counselor supervision. Elementary School Guidance & Counseling.
30(1), p. 35-44.
National Board for Certified Counselors (2005). The practice
of Internet counseling. Retrieved August 24, 2006 from
http://www.nbcc.org/webethics2
National Center for Education Statistics (2003). High school
guidance counseling. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education,
National Center for Education Statistics.
Neukrug,
E. S. (1991). Computer-assisted live supervision in counselor skills
training. Counselor Education and Supervision, 31, 132-138.
Owen & Weikel, D. (1999). Computer Utilization by School
Counselors. Professional School Counseling, 2(3), 1096-2409.
Pyle, K. R. (1984). Career counseling and computers: Where is
the creativity? Journal of Counseling and Development, 63, 141-144.
Rust, E. B. (1995). Applications of the International
Counselor Network for elementary and middle school counseling. Elementary
School Guidance & Counseling, 30, 16-25.
Sabella, R. (2005). What are school counselors doing with
technology?. Retrieved August 24, 2006 from
http://schoolcounselor.com/pdf/counseling-technology-activities.pdf
Sabella, R. A., & Booker, B. L. (2003). Using technology to
promote your guidance and counseling program among stake holders.
Professional School Counseling, 6 (3), 206-213.
Sabella, R.A. (1998). Practical technology applications for
peer helper programs and training. Peer Facilitator Quarterly, 15(2),
4-13.
Sabella, R.A. (2003). SchoolCounselor.com: A friendly and
practical guide to the World Wide Web. (2nd ed). Minneapolis, MN:
Educational Media Corporation.
Sampson, J., Kolodinsky, R., & Greeno, B. (1997). Counseling
on the information highway: Future possibilities and potential problems.
Journal of Counseling & Development, 75, 203-212.
Sharf, R. S., & Lucas, M. (1993). An assessment of a
computerized simulation of counseling skills. Counselor Education and
Supervision, 32, 254-266.
Shulman, H. A., Sweeney, B., & Gerler, E. R. (1995). A
computer-assisted approach to preventing alcohol abuse: Implications for
the middle school. Elementary School Guidance & Counseling, 30, 63-77.
Stone, C. & Turba, R. (1999). School counselors using
technology for advocacy. The Journal of Technology in Counseling, 1 (1).
[Online]. Available:
http://jtc.colstate.edu/vol1_1/advocacy.htm.
Tyler, J.M., & Sabella, R.A. (2004). Using technology to
improve counseling practice: A primer for the 21st century. Alexandria,
VA: American Counseling Association.
Van Horn, S.M, & Myrick, R.D. (2001). Computer technology and
the 21st century school counselor. Professional School Counseling, 5(2),
124-130.
Woodward, E. H. & Gridina, N. (1999). Media in the home: The
fifth annual survey of parents and children. Annenberg Public Policy
Center, WA: Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of
Pennsylvania. Retrieved December 26th, 2006 from
http://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/05_media_developing_child/mediasurvey/survey7.pdf
Author's
Biography